Who's the daddy, mummies? 3,800-year-old remains of Egyptian elite men buried together reveals they had DIFFERENT fathers but the same mother

  • Mummies of two men, Khnum-nakht and Nakht-ankh, date to around 1800BC
  • Since their discovery in 1907 there has been debate whether the two are related
  • DNA extracted from their teeth has now solved the long-standing mystery
  • It revealed that these two men share a mother but have different fathers 

The famous 'two brothers' mummies in Manchester Museum could be at the heart of an ancient family scandal. 

The mummies of two elite men, Khnum-nakht and Nakht-ankh, date to around 1800 BC and are the oldest human remains in Manchester's Egyptology collection. 

Their grave, found in 1907 near Cairo, had inscriptions that suggested both men were the sons of a local governor. 

Now, by extracting 'ancient DNA' from their teeth, researchers have discovered these two men share a mother but have different fathers.

Scientists are unsure if their mother had an affair, and the true identity of the illegitimate boys was kept a secret, or if one of the brothers was adopted.

Scroll down for video

The famous 'Two Brothers' mummies of the Manchester Museum (pictured) are in fact half-brothers, according to the latest DNA sequencing

The famous 'Two Brothers' mummies of the Manchester Museum (pictured) are in fact half-brothers, according to the latest DNA sequencing

The 'Two Brothers' were important, elite men from the upper class of ancient Egypt and one was the son of a local governor.

Analysis showed that both Nakht-Ankh and Khnum-Nakht belonged to mitochondrial haplotype M1a1.

A haplotype is a group of genes that are inherited from a single parent. 

The fact they share the M1a1 means they are related along their their maternal lines as this always comes down the female line.

The Y chromosome sequences were less complete but showed variations between the two mummies. 

This indicated that Nakht-Ankh and Khnum-Nakht were very likely to have been half-brothers with different fathers.

This answered the 'million dollar question' - indicating the men were really half-brothers.

INFIDELITY AND ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN IN ANCIENT EGYPT

Infidelity on the part of men was likely commonplace in Ancient Egypt, with seemingly few consequences for an unfaithful husband.

The greater a man's social status, the more likely it was that he would father illegitimate children.

Pharaoh Ramesses II is said to have had so many wives and concubines that he sired more than 100 offspring.

A straying wife and her lover could expect severe punishment, however, according to surviving literature from the time.

The Westcar Papyrus describes the wife of a royal scribe who committed adultery being seized on the orders of the Pharaoh.

She was then bound to a stake and burned alive, with her Earthly remains thrown into the Nile. 

The tales contained in the Papryus are fictional, but they hint at the attitudes of the time toward cheating women.

In reality, punishment was likely a private affair between husband and wife, rather than a criminal or moral issue for society.

This might include divorce, beatings, or even death.

Illegitimate children themselves seem to have suffered no specific hardships or discrimination in Dynastic Egypt as a consequence of their position.

Another ancient papyrus, the Tale of Truth and Falsehood, does describe a young fatherless boy being cruelly taunted by his schoolmates about his parentage, but it did not imply a serious social disadvantage. 

Advertisement
DNA extracted from their teeth solved the long-standing mystery and revealed that these two men share a mother but have different fathers

DNA extracted from their teeth solved the long-standing mystery and revealed that these two men share a mother but have different fathers

'It was a long and exhausting journey to the results but we are finally here', said Dr Konstantina Drosou, of the School of Earth and Environmental Sciences at the University of Manchester who conducted the DNA sequencing.

'I am very grateful we were able to add a small but very important piece to the big history puzzle and I am sure the brothers would be very proud of us. These moments are what make us believe in ancient DNA. ' 

While it is is unknown whether one of the brothers, or both, were illegitimate, infidelity on the part of men was likely commonplace in Ancient Egypt, with seemingly few consequences for an unfaithful husband. 

The greater a man's social status, the more likely it was that he would father illegitimate children. 

A straying wife and her lover could expect severe punishment, however, according to surviving literature from the time. 

Illegitimate children themselves seem to have suffered no specific hardships or discrimination in Dynastic Egypt as a consequence of their position. 

The study published in the Journal of Archaeological Science is the first to successfully analyse both mitochondrial and Y chromosomal DNA in Egyptian mummies.  

They were first unwrapped at the Museum in 1908, a year after they were discovered by the great English Egyptologist Sir Flinders Petrie and his colleagues.

The pair's joint burial site, later dubbed The Tomb of The Two Brothers, was discovered at Deir Rifeh, a village 250 miles south of Cairo.  

The undecorated rock-cut chamber contained the undisturbed burials of the two men. 

It was the greatest discovery of its time - occurring 15 years before Howard Carter found the tomb of the 'Boy King' Tutankhamun.

Although modest in size, the tomb was remarkable both for the quality of its funeral equipment and for the enduring mystery of its occupants.

STORY OF THE 'TWO BROTHERS'

The pair's joint burial site was discovered at Deir Rifeh, a village 250 miles (400km) south of Cairo.

They were found by Egyptian workmen directed by early 20th century Egyptologists, Flinders Petrie and Ernest Mackay. 

Hieroglyphic inscriptions on the coffins indicated that both men were the sons of an unnamed local governor and had mothers with the same name, Khnum-aa. 

It was then the men became known as the Two Brothers.

The complete contents of the tomb were shipped to Manchester in 1908 and the mummies of both men were unwrapped by the UK's first professional female Egyptologist, Dr Margaret Murray. 

Her team concluded that the skeletal morphologies were quite different, suggesting an absence of family relationship. 

However, in 2015, the DNA was extracted from the teeth.

Analysis showed that both Nakht-Ankh and Khnum-Nakht belonged to mitochondrial haplotype M1a1, suggesting a maternal relationship. 

The Y chromosome sequences were less complete but showed variations between the two mummies, indicating that Nakht-Ankh and Khnum-Nakht had different fathers, and were thus very likely to have been half-brothers.

Advertisement

Hieroglyphic inscriptions on the coffins indicated both men were the sons of an unnamed local governor and had mothers with the same name, Khnum-aa. 

It was then the men became known as the Two Brothers. 

But doubts were immediately raised when the complete contents of the tomb were shipped to Manchester in 1908.  

The Two Brothers are the Museum's oldest mummies and amongst the best-known human remains in its Egyptology collection

The Two Brothers are the Museum's oldest mummies and amongst the best-known human remains in its Egyptology collection

The pair's joint burial site, later dubbed The Tomb of The Two Brothers, was discovered at Deir Rifeh, a village 250 miles south of Cairo

The pair's joint burial site, later dubbed The Tomb of The Two Brothers, was discovered at Deir Rifeh, a village 250 miles south of Cairo

WHAT DID THEY DO?

The DNA was extracted from the teeth which captured the mitochondrial and Y chromosome fractions.

This enabled the argument to be settled, once and for all, as mitochondrial DNA is passed only from a mother to her son, and the Y chromosome only from a father to his son. 

Analysis showed that both Nakht-Ankh and Khnum-Nakht belonged to mitochondrial haplotype M1a1, suggesting a maternal relationship. 

The Y chromosome sequences were less complete but showed variations between the two mummies. 

This indicated that Nakht-Ankh and Khnum-Nakht had different fathers, and were thus very likely to have been half-brothers.

This answered the 'million dollar question' - indicating the men were really half-brothers.

The study published in the Journal of Archaeological Science is the first to successfully analyse both mitochondrial and Y chromosomal DNA in Egyptian mummies.  

Advertisement

 The complete contents of the tomb were unwrapped by the UK's first professional female Egyptologist, Dr Margaret Murray.

It was one of the first scientific studies of bodies from ancient Egypt. 

Her team concluded the skeletal morphologies were quite different, suggesting the men were not even blood relations.

Based on contemporary inscriptional evidence, it was proposed one of the 'Brothers' was adopted. 

So, in 2015, the DNA was extracted from the teeth which captured the mitochondrial and Y chromosome fractions.

This enabled the argument to be settled, once and for all, as mitochondrial DNA is passed only from a mother to her son, and the Y chromosome only from a father to his son.   

Dr Campbell Price, Curator of Egypt and Sudan at Manchester Museum, said: 'The University of Manchester, and Manchester Museum in particular, has a long history of research on ancient Egyptian human remains. 

'Our reconstructions will always be speculative to some extent but to be able to link these two men in this way is an exciting first.'

 

The comments below have not been moderated.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

We are no longer accepting comments on this article.